After combing through the Internet for every imaginable interview tip, I realized there is very little that encapsulates the gist of the teacher interview. While I came across many sites (here, here, and here are a start) touting they had the most comprehensive list, I found it best to approach the interview questions with a more holistic approach. Armed with a pool of responses that catered to categories rather than isolated questions, I had a much easier time responding to questions worded in an unconventional manner. Additionally, this approach protected me from hitting a block when faced with curveball questions. Instead of
hesitating freaking because the assessment question was posed slightly different from the typical assessment question, I carefully crafted a response to meet the unexpected wording.
This approach also allowed me to compartmentalize my responses and keep track of the information I knew I wanted to convey at some point in the interview — better known as, “things I wanted the interview committee to hear.”
Below are the categories I prepared. Something to note: I last interviewed several years ago. When applicable, I provided possible responses if I was currently going through the interview process.
My strengths, my weaknesses:
Strengths: Ability to connect with all kids (my professor instilled in our entire cohort that relationships sit at the cornerstone of teacher effectiveness). You know yourself best – let it ring, while also highlighting that there is ALWAYS something new to learn in the education world.
Weaknesses: This is a tough one — you want to avoid sounding overly confident, but also don’t want to highlight any flaws (ex: you’re never on time). I am a procrastinator to the end. No matter what strategies I try, I will always be a last minute type of girl. While I didn’t I worked this into my response my stating that I often spend countless amounts of time looking at resources for the BEST possible strategy or delivery model for a particular piece of content, which can be very time-consuming. Rather than accepting the fact that there may be more than one BEST way of delivering the content, I keep searching until I am 100% satisfied with my selection.
Lessons/Units to discuss:
Google Earth: This served as an engagement, technology, and/or cross-discipline response.
Document Based Questions: This served as a research, writing, and/or inquiry response. I Also touched on my use of screencast to provide tutorials for students (emphasizes technology skill)
Civil War Debate: This served as an engagement and/or rigor response.
Feedback: If this was today, I would discuss my use of Google Classroom and Google Docs to provide feedback and facilitate the revision process.
Collaboration: I discussed my experience with Professional Learning Communities, specifically how we utilized flexible grouping across the grade level to differentiate curriculum and specific lessons.
Assessment: I discussed the use of Flubaroo for data collection on assessments to identify questions (and skills) that students struggled with to inform future instruction.
Differentiation: I cross-referenced my work with PLCs (mentioned above) and shared how I varied an essay with three minor adjustments to create three drastically different assignments. The end result was a unique product for all students because they pulled their evidence from self-selected and teacher selected books, while also responding to an essay question that meet their individual needs.
Classroom management: I took the interview panel through my classroom as if they were student. I discussed the protocol beginning with how I stand outside my door to greet students before every class, followed by a task projected on the board at the start of every class. I discussed norms in my classroom and fair discipline.
Parent involvement: I discussed a particular situation when I partnered with a parent to gain better results for a particular student. I also discussed my protocol for contacting parents at the start of the year to welcome them to class so that their first communication is positive. I also discussed my standards for contacting home when a student is in need, but also when a student deserves praise. I also discussed the accessibility and resourcefulness of my class (primarily homework) blog.
Questions I was asked that were not necessarily expected:
What was your best day of teaching and your worst day of teaching (I will admit, I was NOT prepared to answer the second question), but I relied on my philosophy about taking a lesson that didn’t go well period 1, to improve it for later on in the day. I was stumped on this question because I was uncertain about whether they wanted me to detail something like, the worst day was when the Virginia Tech shooting happened because it was an emotional day, and my students were scared, or something related to instruction.
Describe a research project you have conducted with your students. This was difficult for me to answer because I came from a place that did not place enough of an emphasis on research because they were consumed by state standards. I was honest in my response, but found the closest thing that related to the question.
Know what you want them to know about you. I wanted to share my approach with backwards design. I knew that it may not come up with a question, so I weaved it into my response when asked about something else (most likely about a lesson).
Have specific stories, experiences to fall back on, but also mesh in your philosophy. You will not have an opportunity to share everything, so use an experience question to weave in your philosophy – it’s ok to veer off for a thought or two as long as you quickly get back on track to answering the question. Or, when asked about your philosophy, cite a specific lesson you used to incorporate it.
Books you have read: Have a kid title (I choose something is relevant to the position I am interviewing for, not the previous position I held – I used Sherman Alexie’s, The Absolutely True Story of a Part-Time Indian), adult title (I had just finished reading Little Bee — you want it to be something that is slightly under the radar, not entirely popular, yet not completely obscure either. Most likely, the interview panel is looking for future reads for their own reading pleasure) and education title (I used Teach Like A Champion because I had just finished reading it for a graduate class. If I were interviewing today, I would use Beers and Probst’s Notice & Note) ready on the tip of your tongue. This is not a question to fumble or fake.
Finally, regardless of your response, pick something that you do well and have experience with, rather than a buzzword you think the panel wants to hear. While it’s important to cover certain topics, do it in an authentic manner. The interview panel has to believe you do said strategy, rather than just hear that you do said strategy. If your PLC experience wasn’t up to par, don’t say that it was.
Be yourself, take a minute to collect your thoughts when responding, and most importantly, keep a list of a few you want to highlight over the course of your interview. It’s okay to glance at your notes, as long as they aren’t recorded in a notebook that looks something like this ;-).